“Oh, no! I broke one of my Grammys. Now I only have three. My wallet’s too small for my fifties, and my diamond shoes are too tight!”

andeverythingisgoingtothebeat:

Moments before impact.

It still hurts.

via laurating

Grammy’s GChat: Awkward Performances and Awkward Children

jduboff: so this morning i was talking about the grammys, and i basc realized that there was nothing about the show i really LIKED

sam-d: yeah, it’s really gotten itself into an awkward situation

the AMAs and the VMAs are freed by the fact that there are no “gravitas” to their awards, so they can just have the craziest, most exciting performers. the grammys try to compete, but are held back by their pretension, and thus it’s just an awkward in between.

and you have Lady Antebellum and Maxwell performing to cover “all types of music”

jduboff: agreed

the show definitely lacked any sense of fun or excitement

even gaga seemed somehow weighed down by the whole thing. like no matter how CRAZY she tried to be, she was going to be followed by a lifetime achievement montage to a jazz singer no one knows

sam-d: yeah very well put. plus, it’s sad to see gaga ever be derivative—but especially when it’s derivative of EMINEM.

everyone’s been talking about pink’s performance. did you agree she stole the night?

jduboff: lol. i was not into pink’s performance at all

as soon as i saw the hint of the S&M-ish bodice-hugging situation underneath her hooded frock i knew it was going to be annoying

i mean:

a) she already did an “aerial” performance like 2 days ago

b) and who CARES?! she sang a song while hanging in a hammock thing

what did you think?

sam-d: i kept thinking about how weird it was that this was the singer who made her start with “get the party started” and a pseudo lesbian-biker motif

jduboff: yeah, it’s like WELL WHAT CAN I DO NOW TO STAND OUT - i know! i can do fake cirque de soleil

Read More